Best Known (29, 29+31, s)-Nets in Base 64
(29, 29+31, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 60, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 60, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(29, 29+31, 863)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (29, 60, 863)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6460, 863, F64, 31) (dual of [863, 803, 32]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6460, 1365, F64, 31) (dual of [1365, 1305, 32]-code), using
(29, 29+31, 1296377)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 60, 1296378)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 59, 1296378)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 36696 089552 006804 378231 138060 208233 707680 031137 642145 803595 984511 599800 781016 673490 221784 533576 468610 532344 > 6459 [i]