Best Known (12, 12+32, s)-Nets in Base 64
(12, 12+32, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 44, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 44, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(12, 12+32, 257)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (12, 44, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
(12, 12+32, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(12, 44, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(12, 12+32, 289)-Net in Base 64
(12, 44, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 33, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(12, 12+32, 9996)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 44, 9997)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 29 657253 960455 563816 784541 197623 828164 366500 475040 393745 714606 442984 660545 189872 > 6444 [i]