Best Known (16, 16+36, s)-Nets in Base 64
(16, 16+36, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(16, 16+36, 260)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(16, 52, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 39, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(16, 16+36, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (16, 52, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
(16, 16+36, 321)-Net in Base 64
(16, 52, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 56, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 42, 321)-net over F256, using
(16, 16+36, 19790)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 52, 19791)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 8349 825007 236661 393755 623687 992577 060451 134088 326608 555597 990361 866769 563929 186180 212975 637628 > 6452 [i]