Best Known (52−37, 52, s)-Nets in Base 64
(52−37, 52, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 52, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(52−37, 52, 258)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (15, 52, 258)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 257)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 258, using
(52−37, 52, 259)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(15, 52, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
(52−37, 52, 321)-Net in Base 64
(15, 52, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
(52−37, 52, 15705)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 52, 15706)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 51, 15706)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 130 418952 207661 136078 805934 889068 976809 009820 678496 973509 515533 558810 704601 518367 461536 403052 > 6451 [i]