Best Known (36, 36+37, s)-Nets in Base 64
(36, 36+37, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 73, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 73, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(36, 36+37, 1366)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (36, 73, 1366)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(6473, 1366, F64, 3, 37) (dual of [(1366, 3), 4025, 38]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6473, 4098, F64, 37) (dual of [4098, 4025, 38]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(36) ⊂ Ce(35) [i] based on
- linear OA(6473, 4096, F64, 37) (dual of [4096, 4023, 38]-code), using an extension Ce(36) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
- linear OA(6471, 4096, F64, 36) (dual of [4096, 4025, 37]-code), using an extension Ce(35) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,35], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 36 [i]
- linear OA(640, 2, F64, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(640, s, F64, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(36) ⊂ Ce(35) [i] based on
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6473, 4098, F64, 37) (dual of [4098, 4025, 38]-code), using
(36, 36+37, 2011441)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 73, 2011442)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 72, 2011442)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 11090 682437 102657 880761 392863 968841 065637 968111 338980 627691 336544 976051 191363 443416 543165 961359 594940 947688 854815 072021 872200 797296 > 6472 [i]