Best Known (56−39, 56, s)-Nets in Base 64
(56−39, 56, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 56, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 56, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(56−39, 56, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (17, 56, 267)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (16, 56, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
(56−39, 56, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(56−39, 56, 321)-Net in Base 64
(17, 56, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (17, 60, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 45, 321)-net over F256, using
(56−39, 56, 21286)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 56, 21287)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 55, 21287)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 2188 542957 438341 850307 909807 609161 386211 235520 930200 695676 256583 483974 367110 876912 538236 805901 308040 > 6455 [i]