Best Known (38, 38+39, s)-Nets in Base 64
(38, 38+39, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 77, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 77, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(38, 38+39, 1366)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (38, 77, 1366)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(6477, 1366, F64, 3, 39) (dual of [(1366, 3), 4021, 40]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6477, 4098, F64, 39) (dual of [4098, 4021, 40]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(38) ⊂ Ce(37) [i] based on
- linear OA(6477, 4096, F64, 39) (dual of [4096, 4019, 40]-code), using an extension Ce(38) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,38], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 39 [i]
- linear OA(6475, 4096, F64, 38) (dual of [4096, 4021, 39]-code), using an extension Ce(37) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,37], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 38 [i]
- linear OA(640, 2, F64, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(640, s, F64, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(38) ⊂ Ce(37) [i] based on
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6477, 4098, F64, 39) (dual of [4098, 4021, 40]-code), using
(38, 38+39, 2111509)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 77, 2111510)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 76, 2111510)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 186072 364635 863226 195629 232565 949258 621618 557312 574222 486072 371579 875111 839352 946915 462486 121538 869732 817971 306610 412195 249408 056915 839278 > 6476 [i]