Best Known (46, 46+40, s)-Nets in Base 64
(46, 46+40, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(46, 46+40, 546)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(46, 86, 546)-net in base 64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (8, 28, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- (18, 58, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 63, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 54, 288)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 63, 288)-net in base 64, using
- (8, 28, 258)-net in base 64, using
(46, 46+40, 2598)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (46, 86, 2598)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6486, 2598, F64, 40) (dual of [2598, 2512, 41]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6486, 4119, F64, 40) (dual of [4119, 4033, 41]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(39) ⊂ Ce(31) [i] based on
- linear OA(6479, 4096, F64, 40) (dual of [4096, 4017, 41]-code), using an extension Ce(39) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,39], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 40 [i]
- linear OA(6463, 4096, F64, 32) (dual of [4096, 4033, 33]-code), using an extension Ce(31) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,31], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 32 [i]
- linear OA(647, 23, F64, 7) (dual of [23, 16, 8]-code or 23-arc in PG(6,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(647, 64, F64, 7) (dual of [64, 57, 8]-code or 64-arc in PG(6,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(57,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(647, 64, F64, 7) (dual of [64, 57, 8]-code or 64-arc in PG(6,64)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(39) ⊂ Ce(31) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6486, 4119, F64, 40) (dual of [4119, 4033, 41]-code), using
(46, 46+40, 7700856)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 86, 7700857)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 214525 352029 515750 306334 064202 395792 645180 449184 990111 221941 208756 994234 938107 985089 610110 316026 328866 656694 157014 095914 334040 359919 224948 244004 352887 738894 > 6486 [i]