Best Known (64−47, 64, s)-Nets in Base 64
(64−47, 64, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 64, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 64, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(64−47, 64, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(17, 64, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 48, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(64−47, 64, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (17, 64, 267)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (16, 64, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
(64−47, 64, 289)-Net in Base 64
(17, 64, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 48, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(64−47, 64, 13246)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 64, 13247)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (17, 63, 13247)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 616036 035410 105300 495558 071424 265685 230191 334915 121423 663242 089090 680143 779739 520799 403751 540321 961021 334613 701688 > 6463 [i]