Best Known (18, 18+50, s)-Nets in Base 64
(18, 18+50, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(18, 18+50, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(18, 68, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(18, 18+50, 281)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (18, 68, 281)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 280)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 281, using
(18, 18+50, 289)-Net in Base 64
(18, 68, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(18, 18+50, 13203)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 68, 13204)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 661 748384 899780 240179 764874 306959 537719 629686 944294 973081 144976 536889 384950 753806 196884 883775 590230 943924 589299 248585 756528 > 6468 [i]