MinT - Best Known (14, 14+51, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (14, 14+51, s)-Nets in Base 64

(14, 14+51, 177)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (14, 65, 177)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 65, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(14, 14+51, 192)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(14, 65, 192)-net in base 64, using

12 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 77, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 66, 192)-net over F₁₂₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(14, 14+51, 257)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (14, 65, 257)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (12, 65, 257)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
    - K_1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₆₄ [i]

(14, 14+51, 6781)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (14, 65, 6782)-net in base 64, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 64, 6782)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64^mÂ â‰¥ 39 503312 105814 528973 733339 685861 319586 030313 732124 993522 853165 402171 372809 688494 286717 050228 419562 054611 408865 442407 > 64⁶⁴ [i]