Best Known (52−9, 52, s)-Nets in Base 64
(52−9, 52, 4464702)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 52, 4464702)-net over F64, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 6, 270402)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(646, 270402, F64, 3, 3) (dual of [(270402, 3), 811200, 4]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(646, 270402, F64, 2, 3) (dual of [(270402, 2), 540798, 4]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(646, 270402, F64, 3, 3) (dual of [(270402, 3), 811200, 4]-NRT-code), using
- digital (9, 13, 2097150)-net over F64, using
- s-reduction based on digital (9, 13, 4194301)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6413, 4194301, F64, 4, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 4), 16777191, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(6413, 4194301, F64, 3, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 3), 12582890, 5]-NRT-code), using
- OA 2-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6413, 8388602, F64, 4) (dual of [8388602, 8388589, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6413, large, F64, 4) (dual of [large, large−13, 5]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6413, large, F64, 4) (dual of [large, large−13, 5]-code), using
- OA 2-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6413, 8388602, F64, 4) (dual of [8388602, 8388589, 5]-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(6413, 4194301, F64, 3, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 3), 12582890, 5]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6413, 4194301, F64, 4, 4) (dual of [(4194301, 4), 16777191, 5]-NRT-code), using
- s-reduction based on digital (9, 13, 4194301)-net over F64, using
- digital (24, 33, 2097150)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6433, 2097150, F64, 9, 9) (dual of [(2097150, 9), 18874317, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6433, 8388601, F64, 9) (dual of [8388601, 8388568, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6433, large, F64, 9) (dual of [large, large−33, 10]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 648−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−3,…,4}|+1 = 10 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6433, large, F64, 9) (dual of [large, large−33, 10]-code), using
- OOA 4-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6433, 8388601, F64, 9) (dual of [8388601, 8388568, 10]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6433, 2097150, F64, 9, 9) (dual of [(2097150, 9), 18874317, 10]-NRT-code), using
- digital (3, 6, 270402)-net over F64, using
(52−9, 52, large)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (43, 52, large)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (41, 52, large)-net over F64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 55, large)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6455, large, F64, 14) (dual of [large, large−55, 15]-code), using
- 2 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6453, large, F64, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- 2 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6453, large, F64, 14) (dual of [large, large−53, 15]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6455, large, F64, 14) (dual of [large, large−55, 15]-code), using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 55, large)-net over F64, using
(52−9, 52, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 52, large)-net in base 64, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 45, large)-net in base 64, but