Best Known (12, 35, s)-Nets in Base 64
(12, 35, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 35, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 35, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(12, 35, 257)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (12, 35, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
(12, 35, 260)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(12, 35, 260)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 36, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 27, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 27, 260)-net over F256, using
(12, 35, 321)-Net in Base 64
(12, 35, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (12, 40, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 30, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 30, 321)-net over F256, using
(12, 35, 29808)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 35, 29809)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 34, 29809)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 25 718224 920576 606691 337511 296323 705832 738210 020140 302908 841680 > 6434 [i]