Best Known (11, 36, s)-Nets in Base 64
(11, 36, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(11, 36, 225)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (11, 36, 225)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (10, 36, 225)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 225, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 224)-sequence over F64, using
(11, 36, 259)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(11, 36, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 27, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
(11, 36, 321)-Net in Base 64
(11, 36, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 27, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
(11, 36, 15555)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 36, 15556)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 35, 15556)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1646 003494 954197 752209 439735 101703 120296 082047 725515 934878 293840 > 6435 [i]