Best Known (13, 48, s)-Nets in Base 64
(13, 48, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (13, 48, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 48, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(13, 48, 257)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (13, 48, 257)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (12, 48, 257)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 256)-sequence over F64, using
(13, 48, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(13, 48, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(13, 48, 289)-Net in Base 64
(13, 48, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 36, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(13, 48, 11216)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (13, 48, 11217)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (13, 47, 11217)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 7 781537 572472 967714 550541 871313 327175 440499 999830 342237 644081 809046 952586 433445 617280 > 6447 [i]