Best Known (15, 58, s)-Nets in Base 64
(15, 58, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 58, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(15, 58, 257)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(15, 58, 257)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 60, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
(15, 58, 258)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (15, 58, 258)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 257)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 258, using
(15, 58, 10995)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 58, 10996)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 57, 10996)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 8 959873 625801 049724 444907 447432 105768 746661 775901 980859 977171 258885 777331 553244 258339 848437 466522 599144 > 6457 [i]