Best Known (21, 59, s)-Nets in Base 64
(21, 59, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(21, 59, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(21, 59, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 25 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
(21, 59, 342)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (21, 59, 342)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 59, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
(21, 59, 51104)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 59, 51105)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 36701 342692 289107 909991 750009 351954 067893 729420 150317 317472 131796 919753 394947 705244 867633 241720 237860 982624 > 6459 [i]