Best Known (21, 61, s)-Nets in Base 64
(21, 61, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 61, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 61, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(21, 61, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(21, 61, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
(21, 61, 342)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (21, 61, 342)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 61, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
(21, 61, 42531)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 61, 42532)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 150 316644 761083 516943 322126 244633 528783 116667 391961 395965 832040 837473 975238 849983 785264 138436 329438 722620 387704 > 6461 [i]