Best Known (18, 66, s)-Nets in Base 64
(18, 66, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(18, 66, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(18, 66, 258)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 68, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 258)-net over F256, using
(18, 66, 281)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (18, 66, 281)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 280)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 281, using
(18, 66, 289)-Net in Base 64
(18, 66, 289)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 68, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 51, 289)-net over F256, using
(18, 66, 14409)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 66, 14410)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 161432 824014 039872 856797 417160 381178 419632 196751 805981 371202 277734 446951 279887 913562 386938 781076 593952 017388 715558 459364 > 6466 [i]