Best Known (22, 72, s)-Nets in Base 64
(22, 72, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 72, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 72, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(22, 72, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(22, 72, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
(22, 72, 342)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (22, 72, 342)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 72, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
(22, 72, 25696)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 72, 25697)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 11095 956430 139824 565067 069152 648101 571704 393899 855233 078636 240464 946684 085707 628716 145537 652146 711642 319194 555445 590867 982576 634080 > 6472 [i]