Best Known (16, 74, s)-Nets in Base 64
(16, 74, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(16, 74, 216)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(16, 74, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
(16, 74, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (16, 74, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
(16, 74, 7513)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 74, 7514)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 45 583396 824734 567369 930693 280544 246688 577893 861831 007736 024124 946738 839984 340767 316457 026232 680994 373162 102677 062715 230939 802105 486576 > 6474 [i]