Best Known (21, 84, s)-Nets in Base 64
(21, 84, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (21, 84, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 84, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(21, 84, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
(21, 84, 342)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (21, 84, 342)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 84, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
(21, 84, 13492)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (21, 84, 13493)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 83, 13493)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 819114 834457 537244 754457 368995 638957 987705 055968 452981 167330 192160 087458 350451 484519 911598 876363 148273 736522 247589 334772 562157 034957 491343 351225 225760 > 6483 [i]