Best Known (43, 86, s)-Nets in Base 64
(43, 86, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 86, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(43, 86, 514)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(43, 86, 514)-net in base 64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (7, 28, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 21, 257)-net over F256, using
- (15, 58, 257)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 60, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 60, 257)-net in base 64, using
- (7, 28, 257)-net in base 64, using
(43, 86, 1534)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (43, 86, 1534)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(6486, 1534, F64, 2, 43) (dual of [(1534, 2), 2982, 44]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(6486, 2051, F64, 2, 43) (dual of [(2051, 2), 4016, 44]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(6486, 4102, F64, 43) (dual of [4102, 4016, 44]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,21]) ⊂ C([0,20]) [i] based on
- linear OA(6485, 4097, F64, 43) (dual of [4097, 4012, 44]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 644−1, defining interval I = [0,21], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−21,−20,…,21}|+1 = 44 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(6481, 4097, F64, 41) (dual of [4097, 4016, 42]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 644−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−20,−19,…,20}|+1 = 42 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(641, 5, F64, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(641, s, F64, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,21]) ⊂ C([0,20]) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(6486, 4102, F64, 43) (dual of [4102, 4016, 44]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(6486, 2051, F64, 2, 43) (dual of [(2051, 2), 4016, 44]-NRT-code), using
(43, 86, 2817597)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 86, 2817598)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 85, 2817598)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 3351 974543 968286 212140 894698 931842 879258 369617 696645 237396 847776 516329 000927 685922 953438 094453 276536 156522 203325 708247 291904 107865 979976 810503 659743 349745 > 6485 [i]