Best Known (22, 90, s)-Nets in Base 64
(22, 90, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 90, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(22, 90, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(22, 90, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
(22, 90, 342)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (22, 90, 342)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 90, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
(22, 90, 12960)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 90, 12961)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 3 601790 013356 654471 885306 053888 673871 950523 473563 295678 341306 703801 445510 735936 180625 335437 547398 685626 039630 101874 977571 633314 108680 655989 761303 322293 929506 873280 > 6490 [i]