Best Known (57−23, 57, s)-Nets in Base 7
(57−23, 57, 110)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 57, 110)-net over F7, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 58, 110)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 29, 55)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 54)-sequence over F49, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 29, 55)-net over F49, using
(57−23, 57, 245)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (34, 57, 245)-net over F7, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(757, 245, F7, 23) (dual of [245, 188, 24]-code), using
- 187 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 18 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(723, 24, F7, 23) (dual of [24, 1, 24]-code or 24-arc in PG(22,7)), using
- dual of repetition code with length 24 [i]
- 187 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 4 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 6 times 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 8 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 11 times 0, 1, 12 times 0, 1, 13 times 0, 1, 15 times 0, 1, 16 times 0, 1, 18 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(723, 24, F7, 23) (dual of [24, 1, 24]-code or 24-arc in PG(22,7)), using
(57−23, 57, 16405)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 57, 16406)-net in base 7, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 56, 16406)-net in base 7, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 7m ≥ 211605 480418 193904 919772 996193 400991 630150 937721 > 756 [i]