Best Known (64−28, 64, s)-Nets in Base 7
(64−28, 64, 108)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 64, 108)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 32, 54)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 53)-sequence over F49, using
(64−28, 64, 185)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (36, 64, 185)-net over F7, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(764, 185, F7, 2, 28) (dual of [(185, 2), 306, 29]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(762, 184, F7, 2, 28) (dual of [(184, 2), 306, 29]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (34, 62, 184)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 31, 92)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 91)-sequence over F49, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 91)-sequence over F49, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 31, 92)-net over F49, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (34, 62, 184)-net over F7, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(762, 184, F7, 2, 28) (dual of [(184, 2), 306, 29]-NRT-code), using
(64−28, 64, 7346)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 64, 7347)-net in base 7, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 7m ≥ 1 220541 585425 990043 141460 009810 795891 069175 616405 173653 > 764 [i]