Best Known (37, 37+29, s)-Nets in Base 7
(37, 37+29, 108)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 66, 108)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 33, 54)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 53)-sequence over F49, using
(37, 37+29, 185)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (37, 66, 185)-net over F7, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(766, 185, F7, 2, 29) (dual of [(185, 2), 304, 30]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(764, 184, F7, 2, 29) (dual of [(184, 2), 304, 30]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (35, 64, 184)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 32, 92)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 91)-sequence over F49, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 91)-sequence over F49, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 32, 92)-net over F49, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (35, 64, 184)-net over F7, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(764, 184, F7, 2, 29) (dual of [(184, 2), 304, 30]-NRT-code), using
(37, 37+29, 8443)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 66, 8444)-net in base 7, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 65, 8444)-net in base 7, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 7m ≥ 8 545534 672999 038184 909205 752065 647853 347886 125747 112073 > 765 [i]