Best Known (33, 58, s)-Nets in Base 7
(33, 58, 108)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 58, 108)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 29, 54)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 53)-sequence over F49, using
(33, 58, 185)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (33, 58, 185)-net over F7, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(758, 185, F7, 2, 25) (dual of [(185, 2), 312, 26]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(756, 184, F7, 2, 25) (dual of [(184, 2), 312, 26]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (31, 56, 184)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 28, 92)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 91)-sequence over F49, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 91)-sequence over F49, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 28, 92)-net over F49, using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (31, 56, 184)-net over F7, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(756, 184, F7, 2, 25) (dual of [(184, 2), 312, 26]-NRT-code), using
(33, 58, 9100)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 58, 9101)-net in base 7, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 57, 9101)-net in base 7, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 7m ≥ 1 481969 318501 841249 140418 239389 703127 784551 130081 > 757 [i]