Best Known (59, 78, s)-Nets in Base 7
(59, 78, 535)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 78, 535)-net over F7, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(778, 535, F7, 19, 19) (dual of [(535, 19), 10087, 20]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 9-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(778, 4816, F7, 19) (dual of [4816, 4738, 20]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(778, 4818, F7, 19) (dual of [4818, 4740, 20]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(4939, 2409, F49, 19) (dual of [2409, 2370, 20]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(18) ⊂ Ce(15) [i] based on
- linear OA(4937, 2401, F49, 19) (dual of [2401, 2364, 20]-code), using an extension Ce(18) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2400 = 492−1, defining interval I = [1,18], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 19 [i]
- linear OA(4931, 2401, F49, 16) (dual of [2401, 2370, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2400 = 492−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(492, 8, F49, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,49)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(492, 49, F49, 2) (dual of [49, 47, 3]-code or 49-arc in PG(1,49)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(47,49) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(492, 49, F49, 2) (dual of [49, 47, 3]-code or 49-arc in PG(1,49)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(18) ⊂ Ce(15) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(4939, 2409, F49, 19) (dual of [2409, 2370, 20]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(778, 4818, F7, 19) (dual of [4818, 4740, 20]-code), using
- OOA 9-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(778, 4816, F7, 19) (dual of [4816, 4738, 20]-code), using
(59, 78, 5791)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (59, 78, 5791)-net over F7, using
(59, 78, large)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 78, large)-net in base 7, because
- 17 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 61, large)-net in base 7, but