Best Known (61, 85, s)-Nets in Base 7
(61, 85, 221)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 85, 221)-net over F7, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 13, 21)-net over F7, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 4, 8)-net over F7, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 7)-sequence over F7, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F7 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- the rational function field F7(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 7)-sequence over F7, using
- digital (1, 9, 13)-net over F7, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (1, 13, 13)-net over F7, using
- digital (0, 4, 8)-net over F7, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (12, 24, 100)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 50)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 49)-sequence over F49, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 50, using
- the rational function field F49(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 49)-sequence over F49, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 50)-net over F49, using
- digital (24, 48, 100)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 24, 50)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 49)-sequence over F49 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 24, 50)-net over F49, using
- digital (5, 13, 21)-net over F7, using
(61, 85, 2435)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (61, 85, 2435)-net over F7, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(785, 2435, F7, 24) (dual of [2435, 2350, 25]-code), using
- 26 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 17 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(781, 2405, F7, 24) (dual of [2405, 2324, 25]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- linear OA(781, 2401, F7, 24) (dual of [2401, 2320, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2400 = 74−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(777, 2401, F7, 23) (dual of [2401, 2324, 24]-code), using an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 2400 = 74−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- linear OA(70, 4, F7, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(70, s, F7, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(22) [i] based on
- 26 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 0, 1, 5 times 0, 1, 17 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(781, 2405, F7, 24) (dual of [2405, 2324, 25]-code), using
(61, 85, 853723)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 85, 853724)-net in base 7, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 7m ≥ 681292 660191 838341 029053 178058 767929 550447 636952 579710 301275 605418 358529 > 785 [i]