Best Known (169−111, 169, s)-Nets in Base 8
(169−111, 169, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 169, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 169, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(169−111, 169, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (58, 169, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 169, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(169−111, 169, 1713)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 169, 1714)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 168, 1714)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 53 130765 357068 615001 452265 644684 743047 180776 940411 435694 795469 231263 419492 933367 312708 961162 922911 604484 813093 337103 505797 592303 934430 200150 189082 035264 > 8168 [i]