Best Known (64−12, 64, s)-Nets in Base 8
(64−12, 64, 43694)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 64, 43694)-net over F8, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(864, 43694, F8, 12, 12) (dual of [(43694, 12), 524264, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(864, 262164, F8, 12) (dual of [262164, 262100, 13]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(864, 262165, F8, 12) (dual of [262165, 262101, 13]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- linear OA(861, 262144, F8, 12) (dual of [262144, 262083, 13]-code), using an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 86−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(843, 262144, F8, 9) (dual of [262144, 262101, 10]-code), using an extension Ce(8) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 86−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(83, 21, F8, 2) (dual of [21, 18, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 63, F8, 2) (dual of [63, 60, 3]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [0,1], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 63, F8, 2) (dual of [63, 60, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(864, 262165, F8, 12) (dual of [262165, 262101, 13]-code), using
- OA 6-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(864, 262164, F8, 12) (dual of [262164, 262100, 13]-code), using
(64−12, 64, 262165)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (52, 64, 262165)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(864, 262165, F8, 12) (dual of [262165, 262101, 13]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
- linear OA(861, 262144, F8, 12) (dual of [262144, 262083, 13]-code), using an extension Ce(11) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 86−1, defining interval I = [1,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 12 [i]
- linear OA(843, 262144, F8, 9) (dual of [262144, 262101, 10]-code), using an extension Ce(8) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 86−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- linear OA(83, 21, F8, 2) (dual of [21, 18, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 63, F8, 2) (dual of [63, 60, 3]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [0,1], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 63, F8, 2) (dual of [63, 60, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(11) ⊂ Ce(8) [i] based on
(64−12, 64, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 64, large)-net in base 8, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 54, large)-net in base 8, but