Best Known (16, 16+13, s)-Nets in Base 8
(16, 16+13, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 29, 160)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (16, 30, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 80)-net over F64, using
(16, 16+13, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (16, 29, 162)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (16, 30, 162)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 15, 81)-net over F64, using
(16, 16+13, 7003)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 29, 7004)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 28, 7004)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 19 345548 709461 354541 298362 > 828 [i]