Best Known (36, 36+17, s)-Nets in Base 8
(36, 36+17, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 53, 354)-net over F8, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 58, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 177)-net over F64, using
(36, 36+17, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(36, 53, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (36, 54, 518)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (9, 27, 259)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 259)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (9, 27, 259)-net in base 64, using
(36, 36+17, 961)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (36, 53, 961)-net over F8, using
(36, 36+17, 398723)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 53, 398724)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 52, 398724)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 91344 682953 556610 306256 022430 049772 879338 181520 > 852 [i]