Best Known (16, 16+18, s)-Nets in Base 8
(16, 16+18, 65)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 34, 65)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (14, 34, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
(16, 16+18, 66)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (16, 34, 66)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(834, 66, F8, 2, 18) (dual of [(66, 2), 98, 19]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(832, 65, F8, 2, 18) (dual of [(65, 2), 98, 19]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,111P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,111P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(832, 65, F8, 2, 18) (dual of [(65, 2), 98, 19]-NRT-code), using
(16, 16+18, 1523)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 34, 1524)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 5 087467 372139 671713 659541 403818 > 834 [i]