Best Known (58−19, 58, s)-Nets in Base 8
(58−19, 58, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 58, 354)-net over F8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (39, 64, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 32, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 32, 177)-net over F64, using
(58−19, 58, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(39, 58, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 82 times duplication [i] based on (37, 56, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (23, 42, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (23, 42, 518)-net over F16, using
(58−19, 58, 886)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (39, 58, 886)-net over F8, using
(58−19, 58, 310610)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 58, 310611)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 57, 310611)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2993 210958 860632 412527 544219 697724 633505 189977 764212 > 857 [i]