Best Known (24, 24+19, s)-Nets in Base 8
(24, 24+19, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 43, 160)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 46, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 23, 80)-net over F64, using
(24, 24+19, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (24, 43, 194)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 44, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 22, 97)-net over F64, using
(24, 24+19, 9701)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 43, 9702)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 42, 9702)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 85 113658 162573 153121 257697 558804 442596 > 842 [i]