Best Known (28, 28+21, s)-Nets in Base 8
(28, 28+21, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 49, 208)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 50, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 25, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 25, 104)-net over F64, using
(28, 28+21, 226)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (28, 49, 226)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 50, 226)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 25, 113)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 25, 113)-net over F64, using
(28, 28+21, 13980)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 49, 13981)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 48, 13981)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 22 306975 121058 848331 632314 070454 146100 936806 > 848 [i]