Best Known (26, 26+22, s)-Nets in Base 8
(26, 26+22, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 48, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 50, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 80)-net over F64, using
(26, 26+22, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (26, 48, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 24, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
(26, 26+22, 6112)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 48, 6113)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 22 328113 485374 184216 585726 713408 347009 260384 > 848 [i]