MinT - Best Known (62, 62+22, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (62, 62+22, s)-Nets in Base 8

(62, 62+22, 514)-Net over F₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (62, 84, 514)-net over F₈, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 84, 514)-net over F₈, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (13, 24, 160)-net over F₈, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 12, 80)-net over F₆₄, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F₆₄, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
  2. digital (37, 60, 354)-net over F₈, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 30, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(62, 62+22, 674)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive

(62, 84, 674)-net in base 8, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (13, 24, 160)-net over F₈, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 12, 80)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. (38, 60, 514)-net in base 8, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (23, 45, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
    - 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (23, 46, 514)-net over F₁₆, using
      - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 23, 257)-net over F₂₅₆, using
        net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F₂₅₆, using
        generalized Faure sequence [i]
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅₆ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
        the rational function field F₂₅₆(x) [i]
        Niederreiter sequence [i]

(62, 62+22, 5104)-Net over F₈ — Digital

Digital (62, 84, 5104)-net over F₈, using

embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8⁸⁴, 5104, F₈, 22) (dual of [5104, 5020, 23]-code), using
- 997 step VarÅ¡amovâ€“Edel lengthening with (r_i)Â = (2, 5 times 0, 1, 23 times 0, 1, 68 times 0, 1, 162 times 0, 1, 302 times 0, 1, 431 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8⁷⁷, 4100, F₈, 22) (dual of [4100, 4023, 23]-code), using
  - constructionÂ X applied to C_e(21) âŠ‚ C_e(20) [i] based on
    1. linear OA(8⁷⁷, 4096, F₈, 22) (dual of [4096, 4019, 23]-code), using an extension C_e(21) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095Â = 8⁴âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,21], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 22 [i]
    2. linear OA(8⁷³, 4096, F₈, 21) (dual of [4096, 4023, 22]-code), using an extension C_e(20) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095Â = 8⁴âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,20], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 21 [i]
    3. linear OA(8⁰, 4, F₈, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
      - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8⁰, s, F₈, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        OA with only one run / dual of code without redundancy [i]

(62, 62+22, 5523815)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s

There is no (62, 84, 5523816)-net in base 8, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8^mÂ â‰¥ 7237 017881 486910 982476 288628 711465 691117 186362 403121 905685 237415 002960 926236 > 8⁸⁴ [i]