Best Known (49−23, 49, s)-Nets in Base 8
(49−23, 49, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 49, 160)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 50, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 80)-net over F64, using
(49−23, 49, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (26, 49, 162)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (26, 50, 162)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 25, 81)-net over F64, using
(49−23, 49, 6112)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 49, 6113)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 48, 6113)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 22 328113 485374 184216 585726 713408 347009 260384 > 848 [i]