Best Known (53−23, 53, s)-Nets in Base 8
(53−23, 53, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 53, 208)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 54, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 104)-net over F64, using
(53−23, 53, 226)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (30, 53, 226)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 54, 226)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 113)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 112)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 113)-net over F64, using
(53−23, 53, 13027)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 53, 13028)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 52, 13028)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 91408 513946 901923 799565 831284 619075 956293 353548 > 852 [i]