Best Known (138, 138+23, s)-Nets in Base 8
(138, 138+23, 762600)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 161, 762600)-net over F8, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(8161, 762600, F8, 23, 23) (dual of [(762600, 23), 17539639, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8161, 8388601, F8, 23) (dual of [8388601, 8388440, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8161, large, F8, 23) (dual of [large, large−161, 24]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 816−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−11,−10,…,11}|+1 = 24 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8161, large, F8, 23) (dual of [large, large−161, 24]-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(8161, 8388601, F8, 23) (dual of [8388601, 8388440, 24]-code), using
(138, 138+23, large)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (138, 161, large)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(8161, large, F8, 23) (dual of [large, large−161, 24]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 816−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−11,−10,…,11}|+1 = 24 (BCH-bound) [i]
(138, 138+23, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 161, large)-net in base 8, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 140, large)-net in base 8, but