Best Known (28, 28+23, s)-Nets in Base 8
(28, 28+23, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 51, 160)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 54, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 27, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 27, 80)-net over F64, using
(28, 28+23, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (28, 51, 194)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (28, 52, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 26, 97)-net over F64, using
(28, 28+23, 8923)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 51, 8924)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 50, 8924)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1427 557524 165255 267470 204211 457605 233035 960689 > 850 [i]