Best Known (38, 38+23, s)-Nets in Base 8
(38, 38+23, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 61, 354)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 62, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 31, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 31, 177)-net over F64, using
(38, 38+23, 460)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (38, 61, 460)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(861, 460, F8, 23) (dual of [460, 399, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(861, 511, F8, 23) (dual of [511, 450, 24]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(861, 511, F8, 23) (dual of [511, 450, 24]-code), using
(38, 38+23, 59130)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 61, 59131)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 60, 59131)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 532572 557642 541131 623474 088370 912552 729063 970381 491928 > 860 [i]