Best Known (52−25, 52, s)-Nets in Base 8
(52−25, 52, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 52, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 26, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
(52−25, 52, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (27, 52, 162)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 26, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
(52−25, 52, 5197)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 52, 5198)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 51, 5198)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 11431 406157 941259 704913 304848 646987 919074 908597 > 851 [i]