Best Known (33, 33+25, s)-Nets in Base 8
(33, 33+25, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 58, 208)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 60, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 30, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 30, 104)-net over F64, using
(33, 33+25, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (33, 58, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 29, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
(33, 33+25, 14713)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 58, 14714)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 57, 14714)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2993 386027 352914 976718 825222 119895 461666 980898 152804 > 857 [i]