Best Known (63−26, 63, s)-Nets in Base 8
(63−26, 63, 256)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 63, 256)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (37, 64, 256)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 32, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 32, 128)-net over F64, using
(63−26, 63, 258)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(37, 63, 258)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (37, 64, 258)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 32, 129)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 35, 129)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 30, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 30, 129)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (5, 35, 129)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (5, 32, 129)-net in base 64, using
(63−26, 63, 288)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (37, 63, 288)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(863, 288, F8, 26) (dual of [288, 225, 27]-code), using
- 26 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 7 times 0, 1, 17 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(861, 260, F8, 26) (dual of [260, 199, 27]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- linear OA(860, 258, F8, 26) (dual of [258, 198, 27]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6430, 129, F64, 26) (dual of [129, 99, 27]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,102P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6430, 129, F64, 26) (dual of [129, 99, 27]-code), using
- linear OA(860, 259, F8, 25) (dual of [259, 199, 26]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 860 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 786175 140070 077847 813691 509886 798809 858889 083632 283616 [i]
- linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(860, 258, F8, 26) (dual of [258, 198, 27]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- 26 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 7 times 0, 1, 17 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(861, 260, F8, 26) (dual of [260, 199, 27]-code), using
(63−26, 63, 19259)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 63, 19260)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 784 925310 618509 665946 666252 999788 576287 159136 150293 815996 > 863 [i]