Best Known (41, 41+26, s)-Nets in Base 8
(41, 41+26, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 67, 354)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 68, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 34, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 34, 177)-net over F64, using
(41, 41+26, 413)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (41, 67, 413)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(867, 413, F8, 26) (dual of [413, 346, 27]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(867, 511, F8, 26) (dual of [511, 444, 27]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 511 = 83−1, defining interval I = [0,25], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(867, 511, F8, 26) (dual of [511, 444, 27]-code), using
(41, 41+26, 36525)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 67, 36526)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 213926 653958 844996 618069 509951 018142 057452 639149 182498 357963 > 867 [i]