Best Known (49, 49+26, s)-Nets in Base 8
(49, 49+26, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 75, 354)-net over F8, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (49, 84, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 42, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 42, 177)-net over F64, using
(49, 49+26, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(49, 75, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (49, 76, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (30, 57, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 58, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 29, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 29, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 58, 516)-net over F16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (30, 57, 516)-net over F16, using
(49, 49+26, 757)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (49, 75, 757)-net over F8, using
(49, 49+26, 131345)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 75, 131346)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 53 920137 299250 124412 712704 808220 096626 717955 781604 572374 791468 385332 > 875 [i]